tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10881309.post113932271667928581..comments2010-03-16T07:02:28.868-05:00Bill Drewhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02630974645444566544noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10881309.post-1139332307835338832006-02-07T12:11:00.000-05:002006-02-07T12:11:00.000-05:00I was unsure if I should respond here or on ILI but I decided here would be fine.<BR/><BR/>I disagree that academic librarians are not discussing Web 2.0. Meredith Farkas, a strong online voice, has discussed it on her blog many times, as have I, and we both work in academic libraries. <BR/><BR/>I think it is unfair to use the Biblioblogosphere as the only indication because, as you know, there are somtimes disproportionately more numbers on the public side of things.Janehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00940477911491808583noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10881309.post-1139328805569007102006-02-07T11:13:00.000-05:002006-02-07T11:13:00.000-05:00Thanks Drew.<BR/>I am reading your concern at COLLIB-L@ala.org, and serendipity brings me to Stephens <A HREF="http://stephenslighthouse.sirsi.com/archives/2006/01/web_20_library_1.html" REL="nofollow">Lighthouse</A> where he is talking about Web 2.0, Library 2.0, Librarian 2.0, etcetera. <BR/>Best wishes from a <A HREF="http://akbani.blogspot.com" REL="nofollow">information visualization blogger</A> and <A HREF="http://www.library.omc.ca" REL="nofollow">Multifaith Librarian</A>Mohamed Taherhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05230356608624560148noreply@blogger.com